• BNP Paribas en Axa medeverantwoordelijk

   

  Het rapport noemt onder andere de bank BNP Paribas en verzekeraar AXA expliciet als instellingen die nog steeds investeren in bedrijven die betrokken zijn bij de bezetting en het geweld in Palestina en Gaza. BNP Paribas financierde de afgelopen jaren bijvoorbeeld Elbit Systems, een Israëlische wapenfabrikant die drones, munitie en bewapening levert die ingezet worden bij luchtaanvallen op Gaza en bij de bewaking van de muur en controleposten in bezet gebied.

   

  AXA, een van de grootste verzekerings- en investeringsgroepen in Europa, blijft investeren in ondernemingen zoals Caterpillar en Motorola. Caterpillar levert de bulldozers die gebruikt worden bij het vernietigen van Palestijnse huizen en landbouwgrond. Motorola levert communicatiesystemen en surveillance-technologie aan het Israëlische leger, technologie die ingezet wordt om Palestijnse burgers te controleren en te onderdrukken.

• Beijing wants the world to believe that a new multipolar is possible, one in which U.S. dominance is giving way to a more balanced international order. However, if China truly wishes to lead that new era, it must confront a hard truth: a concrete global influence cannot be built with pro forma denunciatory speeches and symbolism alone, it needs investment that goes beyond economic alliances to create a security partnership all around the world.

   

• China’s foreign policy has long been defined by caution, non-interventionism, and a preference for quiet diplomacy over confrontation. But this posture, viewed as strategic patience, is fast becoming a liability. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the Middle East, where China’s passivity in the face of Israeli and U.S. aggression has exposed the limits of its global ambition.

   

• However, these gestures have not been transformed into meaningful action. Since October 2023, Israel’s war on Gaza has killed tens of thousands, flattened entire neighborhoods, and triggered a humanitarian catastrophe that many legal scholars and UN officials have described as a potential genocide. The United States has provided full-throated support and military aid, while simultaneously attacking Iranian-linked forces in Syria and Iraq. China, meanwhile, has largely remained on the sidelines, issuing general calls for restraint and peaceful resolution, but it has retained its cooperation with Israel, especially in the economic sphere.

   

• Iran has been one of China’s most reliable regional partners. Over the past decade, Tehran has aligned more closely with Beijing through trade, energy, and strategic cooperation—including a 25-year economic and security agreement signed in 2021. As Western sanctions have deepened, Iran has leaned further into this partnership, viewing China as a lifeline against isolation.

   

• And yet, when Iran came under direct attack, first through Israeli strikes then through US bombs to nuclear sites, Beijing offered little more than silence. There was no clear defense, no diplomatic mobilization, no sign of strategic commitment.

   
• However, the shyness and silence of China will make these states to rethink if it is worth to take the risk of angering US for China as it remained silent even to its partner.

• Much of the Western media is eager to frame the U.S.–China rivalry as a “new Cold War.” But the comparison is misleading. During the original Cold War, the Soviet Union built a vast network of allied states and armed movements. It supported anti-colonial struggles, funded proxies, and directly challenged US influence in multiple regions. It was not merely a rival; it was an alternative. China, by contrast, avoids any such commitments. It has no proxies, no military alliances, and rarely takes a strong stand in ongoing conflicts. Its only real investments lie in infrastructure and trade—not security guarantees or political protection.

   

• This is not multipolarity, it is detachment. And detachment is not what smaller nations seek when they are under threat. The war on Gaza and more importantly the targeting of Iran have created a moment of reckoning. The world is watching not just what the United States does, but how China responds.

   

• Will Beijing continue to prioritize economic ties and diplomatic ambiguity at the expense of credibility? Or will it begin to act like a truly great power—one that takes sides, offers support, and is willing to bear the costs of global leadership? So far, China has chosen the safer path. But in international politics, safety rarely inspires loyalty. If Beijing continues to retreat into silence, it may find that its dream of global leadership dissolves—not with a clash, but with a quiet loss of trust.

   

7 more annotations...

• while the Bundis Sara Wagenknecht (BSW), which could have prevented the scandal with its no vote, abstained! With 348 yes votes and 344 no votes, the result was close." (at: https://mlrg.online/current-events/the-metamorphoses-of-would-be-cdu-chancellor-friederich-merz-and-the-2025-german-federal-elections/ )
• "Mögliche Annäherung im Bund Sahra Wagenknecht spricht sich für Gespräche mit AfD aus at-> https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/bsw-chefin-sahra-wagenknecht-zeigt-sich-offen-fuer-gespraeche-mit-afd-im-bund-a-f4ade7fd-169d-42a7-a56e-382ab5e4df39

   
• Now, Sahra Wagenknecht is open to political talks with the AfD at the federal level as well. Currently, this is not happening; it is a phantom discussion, said Sahra Wagenknecht, chair of the alliance, to the dpa news agency. "But if you ask me whether I would also talk to Mr. Chrupalla if there were a concrete reason for it, as was the case in Thuringia during the meeting between the parliamentary group leaders: yes, of course."
• Previously, AfD leader Tino Chrupalla had advocated contacts with the BSW at the federal level as well. When asked whether he and co-chair Alice Weidel would be available for talks with Wagenknecht, he told broadcaster Welt TV: "Yes, always." He said there have even been talks with the BSW: "About what's moving Germany and how to change majorities."

   

2 more annotations...

• Poll: Overwhelming majority of Jewish Israelis share genocidal belief there are ‘no innocent people in Gaza’

       
• 64% of Israelis agree with this statement, almost two out of three. But it is actually considerably higher among Jewish Israelis, because that number is heavily weighted by Palestinians with Israeli citizenship. Palestinians make up about 20% of the Israeli population and 92% of them oppose the statement, so that leaves Jewish Israelis with overwhelming support.¹ 
• • Even 30% of “left” voters
   
      

• In October 2023, the Israeli President Isaac Herzog paraphrased the same idea by saying that “an entire nation out there that is responsible. This rhetoric about civilians not aware, not involved — it’s not true.” This statement was one of the many genocidal statements that became part of the case for genocide at the ICJ in South  Africa vs. Israel. 

      

• “Amid the war in Gaza and a deepening civil crisis in Israel, many parents are facing a painful challenge: their children are returning home with extreme views and expressions of hatred. These range from justifications for the killing of civilians in Gaza to racist remarks against the ultra-Orthodox, LGBTQ+ individuals and other communities. For many families, this clash between the values taught at home and the messages children absorb from the world around them is deeply troubling.”

   

      
• Ayelet Shaked, then a Jewish Home lawmaker but not-yet minister, shared a social media post with the following text:

• “Who is the enemy? The Palestinian people. Why? Ask them, they started [….] Behind every terrorist stand dozens of men and women, without whom he could not engage in terrorism. Actors in the war are those who incite in mosques, who write the murderous curricula for schools, who give shelter, who provide vehicles, and all those who honor and give them their moral support. They are all enemy combatants, and their blood shall be on all their heads. Now this also includes the mothers of the martyrs, who send them to hell with flowers and kisses. They should follow their sons, nothing would be more just. They should go, as should the physical homes in which they raised the snakes. Otherwise, more little snakes will be raised there.”  

   

      
• The next year, she would become Justice Minister. Shaked voiced downright fascist statements, yet she had the temerity, or chutzpah, to mock the idea of her being a fascist, in a mock-ad where she advertises a perfume called “Fascism,” saying, “smells like democracy to me.”   

• But now, Israel seems to have unleashed itself from such constraints to a much greater degree. It appears that Israel no longer sees the need to put on the perfume of democracy. 

      

7 more annotations...

• devraient mettre le site d'exploitation d'eau minérale naturelle en conformité avec les exigences des autorités sanitaires.

• L'entreprise avait jusqu'au 7 juillet 2025 pour retirer l'ancien système. Le 7 mai, le préfet du Gard avait donné deux mois au groupe pour retirer sa microfiltration à 0,2 micron, estimant, en se fondant sur l'avis des experts de l'Agence régionale de Santé (ARS) Occitanie, que ce dispositif "modifie le microbisme de l'eau produite, en contradiction avec la réglementation en vigueur" sur les eaux minérales naturelles.

• Ce nouveau dispositif est "opérationnel", "quinze jours après le site des Vosges" où sont produites les eaux Hépar et Contrex, sommées de se plier aux mêmes règles, a précisé Nestlé Waters.

• Selon des informations que France 3 Occitanie a pu confirmer, deux captations situées sur la commune de Vergèze devraient être "suspendues" dans le nouveau plan proposé par Nestlé. Cela restreindrait l'activité du site à ses deux puits principaux, situés sur la commune d'Uchaud. Les cinq autres forages que compte le site au global restent ainsi écartés.
• San Pellegrino, Vittel
• un an et demi après les révélations dans la presse sur l'utilisation par Nestlé Waters de traitements illégaux (charbon et UV), un scandale aux multiples rebondissements.

• Nestlé Waters avait remplacé, avec l'assentiment du gouvernement, ces traitements illégaux par une microfiltration à 0,2 micron, nécessaire selon lui pour "assurer la sécurité alimentaire" des produits. Cette microfiltration contestée a finalement été jugée contraire à la réglementation par les autorités.

• Cette décision de Nestlé souligne "à quel point l'État s'est fourvoyé au plus haut niveau en validant, en 2023, dans une décision de Matignon la mise en place de ces traitements désormais retirés", a commenté dans un communiqué le sénateur socialiste Alexandre Ouizille.

6 more annotations...